Communion – July 17

Does “communion” stop at the Lord’s Supper?

communion2

Guest writer – Scott Crawford

When one says the word “communion” in the context of Christian worship, the first – and likely typical – thought that comes to mind is the Lord’s Supper. This is not surprising since the idea of communion conveys the underlying essence of what is happening during that ceremonial observation. Paul notes in 1 Corinthians 10:16 that there is a “cup of blessing” and a “bread which we break,” both of which symbolize a communion among those participating – the first is a communion in the blood and the second in the body of Christ. Thus, the word communion in this respect has taken on the mantle of a title (i.e., “We take Communion every Sunday.”) instead of being recognized as a descriptor of what is being accomplished (a sharing in the blood and body of Christ).

Often, the Greek word which is translated as “communion” in 1 Corinthians 10:16 is translated as “fellowship” in other places. Passages such as Acts 2:42 where the new church is noted to be “devoting themselves” to four things: “the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer” – notice that fellowship and breaking of bread are two distinct activities. There is also Galatians 2:9 where it is noted that “James and Cephas and John” gave Paul and Barnabas the “right hand of fellowship.” Even John talks about fellowship saying that if one claims to have “fellowship with him” but does not live as those “in the light,” then it is the rankest form of self-deception (1 John 1:6-7).

So, the communion, the sharing, the fellowship that is being described in these (and other) verses is pointing us toward a way of life and worship that brings Christians into contact with one another for a common good.

As a way of life, Christians have fellowship with one another when we bear the burdens of the other. One of the first verses that comes to mind regarding this thought is Hebrews 10:24. Then, as now, there are difficulties in this life that confront the Christian and seek to turn one from the right path into despair and isolation. The Hebrews writer is telling us to come together as an assembly for the purpose of drawing strength from our common experiences, so that we might encourage each other to continue in good works regardless of the wickedness in the world.

The concept of fellowship also seems to go along with the idea of contributing to the needs of others so that those with more might help those in need or suffering. Paul notes that it pleased those in Macedonia and Achaia to “make a contribution for the poor among the saints in Jerusalem” (Rom. 15:26). Paul also praises the Philippians for their desire to “share” with him in the “matter of giving and receiving” because they were willing to send him a gift “more than once” for his needs (Phil. 4:15-16).

In worship the idea of communion should be associated with the Lord’s Supper. In fact, not only are we sharing the blood of Christ that was spilt and the body of Christ that was so brutally treated on our behalf, but we are also sharing with all those Christians that have come before us and all those that are yet to believe. As the song says, Christians are connected “by one bright chain of loving rite” until the coming of our Lord. But the idea of communion should also be associated with other practices. When Christians sing, that singing is done to teach and admonish one another (Col. 3:16), or there is a sharing. When Christians pray to God, those prayers bring us closer to God in our “adoption as sons” as we directly address God as “Abba! Father!” (Rom. 8:15) – there is a sharing in the family of God.

As an idea, communion should go beyond one part of a worship assembly – although it is an especially important part. Communion should speak to Christians of the common participation that we have in the life of Christ. Communion should point to the intimate bond that binds our fellowship together in the spiritual blessings of our common salvation. Communion should remind us that there is a sharing that Christians have with one another as the good of others is sought above the good of the self. Communion is best seen in the cohesive nature of the body, speaking to our oneness. Whereas there are many parts to the body each works together for the good of the whole (Rom. 12:4-5). Whereas each of us is an individual with needs and talents, we are also united because “by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body” (1 Cor. 12:13).

“God loves you and I love you and that’s the way it’s gonna be!” – Mike

 

What’s Wrong with Lust?

#1 in a series…

lustful-look-couple

THE SIN IS virtually as old as man himself.  In fact, you could argue that it was the very first sin recorded in Scripture way back in Genesis 3.  Ironically, it was committed—not by the man, but by the woman, when she longed for that which God had explicitly forbidden.  Scripture says, [she] SAW that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the EYES, and that it was DESIRABLE (v. 6; cf. 1 John 2:15-17).  It damaged the very first home then, and it continues to wreak havoc in innumerable homes—in and out of the church—today.  “It” is lust.

Because lust so permeates our society, and because so many Christian lives and marriages have been adversely impacted by the unrestricted and easy availability of online pornography, this issue can no longer be ignored or swept under the proverbial rug.  It MUST be addressed, but more specifically, it must be addressed from a biblical vantage point—even though we may not feel comfortable about the subject matter.  “I think…” “I feel…” and “I tend to believe…” will land us in eternal hell (14:12; 16:25; cf. 2 Kgs. 5:11-12; Acts 26:9).  Our opinions are worth zilch when it comes to life, godliness, and the salvation of our souls (2 Pet. 1:3; cf. Mat. 16:26).  Consider a question:  WHAT EXACTLY IS LUST?

Consider how the WORLD defines it:

“They can easily be confused.  They can easily be misinterpreted and misused.  But they are completely different animals.  Completely different feelings.  It’s just so easy to get so caught up in lust, that you start to actually believe it’s love.  But it’s not.  They are both intense.  They are both incredibly powerful.  But lust will only last so long.  And love?  If it is the right person, it’s not going to fade.  Lust is an intense attraction, and intense and overriding sense of passion.  It’s about chemistry and the sexual desire.  It’s not about what’s underneath the surface.  Lust is simply a desire to be touched by someone.  A desire to be held and to be swept away by another human being…” https:thoughtcatalog.com/lauren-jarvis-gibson/2017/07/the-honest-difference-between-lust-and-love

But now notice how GOD defines it:

“For all that is in the world—the lust of the flesh…” (1 John 2:16a).  The Greek word is, epithumia, pronounced e-pe-thü-me’ä and refers to inordinate (i.e., sinful) desire (cf. Gal. 5:16).

One scholar observes:

“The second part of the word (epithumia) is the Greek word thumos, which describes an urge, a longing, a craving, a passion, or something that is excited.  The word epi usually means over, but when combined with the word thumos, it means to get extremely excited for or over something…”  Rick Renner, Sparkling Gems from the Greek, Vol. I, 490

The world says, that love and lust are both just feelings.  It says that the feeling of lust is short-term, while the feeling of love is long-term, depending upon the person.  It says lust is about chemistry and desire.  It says that lust is simply a desire to be touched.  In reality, from heaven’s vantage point, love is a decision (Eph. 5:25, 28; Col. 3:19; Tit. 2:4), while lust is an overriding sense of illegitimate passion (Gal. 5:16).

Nowhere in Scripture will you find God condemning desire, or for that matter, a strong desire—as such.  (EXAMPLE:  A man who seeks to be an elder must first desire the office—cf. 1 Tim. 3:1).  What the Word condemns is the strong desire/lust for that which is forbidden.  It is not sinful for a husband and wife to desire each other (and they should), but it is wrong for spouses to desire that which he/she has no right to possess.  (EXAMPLE:  Potiphar’s wife “cast longing eyes on Joseph (he wasn’t her husband!), and she said, ‘Lie with me’”—Gen. 39:7).

A couple’s desire for one another is a blessing; it is normal and God-given.  Desire and being strongly desired is one of the ways the Lord draws and keeps a couple together for a lifelong union (Heb. 13:4), while lust divides and drives two partners apart.

“God loves you and I love you and that’s the way it’s gonna be!” – Mike